IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs
Topic Summary:
Created On: 21 January 2019 08:53 am
Status: Read Only
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - PWatts - 21 January 2019 08:53 am  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - AJJewsbury - 21 January 2019 12:20 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - gkenyon - 21 January 2019 01:56 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - chrispearson - 21 January 2019 01:59 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - OMS - 21 January 2019 02:35 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - PWatts - 21 January 2019 03:56 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - Alcomax - 21 January 2019 04:21 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - PWatts - 21 January 2019 04:24 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - Alcomax - 21 January 2019 05:37 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - chrispearson - 22 January 2019 09:48 am  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - AJJewsbury - 22 January 2019 11:01 am  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - mapj1 - 22 January 2019 11:06 am  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - John Peckham - 22 January 2019 11:06 am  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - PWatts - 22 January 2019 04:21 pm  
 Earthing Conductor Installation / High Zs   - mapj1 - 22 January 2019 04:27 pm  
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 21 January 2019 01:56 pm
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



gkenyon

Posts: 5354
Joined: 06 May 2002

Originally posted by: AJJewsbury
2.8 Ohms seems rather high - given a Ze of only 0.03 Ohms that would imply the existing cable has an impedance of around 2.77 Ohms. A quick google suggests that 120mm2 4-core SWA should have one core + armour impedance of about 0.8 or 0.9 milliOhms/metre - so 180m shouldn't be more than about 0.16 Ohms (even ignoring the benefit of the 185mm2). I do wonder if there's something else wrong - like an open c.p.c. connection somewhere and the earth loop is completing only via some random parallel path? If so, finding and fixing that problem might reduce or even eliminate the Zs problem you're seeing.
Agreed - worth looking into this, BS 5467 Table F2, for example, is only 0.69 milliOhms / m for round conductor, and 0.76 milliOhms / m for shaped conductors.

By my reckoning, this still gives R2 of 0.137 Ohms, which is itself above the Max Zs for the MCCB stated in the OP, so reinforcement of the earthing is still required.

BS 7671 would require Adiabatic to be considered in addition to the points Andy raised.

-------------------------
EUR ING Graham Kenyon CEng MIET TechIOSH
G Kenyon Technology Ltd

Web-Site: www.gkenyontech.com
Statistics

New here?

  • To participate in discussions, please log in and introduce yourself.

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2022 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

 
..